Performance

From OpenSimulator

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Performance studies)
(Performance studies)
Line 77: Line 77:
 
==Performance studies==
 
==Performance studies==
  
These are very technical studies, but they do provide some interesting data on the performance limitations of OpenSim at various points in time.
+
These are technical studies, but they do provide some interesting data on the performance limitations of OpenSim at various points in time.
  
 
* [http://www.sciencesim.com/wiki/doku.php/vwperf/start http://www.sciencesim.com/wiki/doku.php/vwperf/start] - Links to ScienceSim performance studies, including some very recent ones.
 
* [http://www.sciencesim.com/wiki/doku.php/vwperf/start http://www.sciencesim.com/wiki/doku.php/vwperf/start] - Links to ScienceSim performance studies, including some very recent ones.

Revision as of 15:32, 24 August 2010

Contents

Introduction

OpenSim performance is a very complex issue. Performance can be affected by any number of things, including the number of prims on a region, number of regions, number of avatars, network quality between server and viewer, network quality between simulator and grid services, etc.

Hardware Requirements

Unfortunately, this is a very difficult question in light of all the factors mentioned above. Below are some examples of hardware people use/have used. Please feel free to add to the list, or to add any reports to the performance reports section. These are examples to help you in your selection, not necessarily recommendations.

Object Parts ~= # prim

Sensors and Timers are generally more intensive then regular scripts, so please specify quantity of each.

Description Operating System RAM/AVG_USE_% CPU #/type of regions # simultaneous avs #scripts/timers/Sensors Location #objectparts
hosted Xen VPS Ubuntu Intrepid (8.10) 540MB/? 1x quad-core 2.5GHz Xeon (L5420) 1 region + 9 voids generally 1-2 few Knifejaw Atoll & surrounding on OSGrid ?
hosted Xen VPS Ubuntu Jaunty (9.04) 360MB/? 2x dual-core 2.0GHz Xeon (5130) 1 void generally 1-2 none Knifejaw Road on OSGrid ?
cari.net Core2Duo Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition SP2 1300mb Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4400 @ 2.00ghz 1.99gb of Ram 16 voids 6 Full Regions 2-10 1500+ scripts / ?? timers / ?? sensors Arizona Bay I-IV / Ku 1-10 / (OKC) Sui / (OKC) Ka / Jedi / Sith / Underverse / Monopoly (all@osgrid) 20000+ Prims
Dedicated Server from A+ Windows Server 2003 1 Meg 1x single-core 2.8GHz Celeron 2regions per server 6 at once with no issues Waterfalls, texture anims, window texture switchers, lots of sound loops Pleasure Planet Welcome center & Region Pleasure Planet in OSGrid 20000 prims per region
Amazon EC2 "high-CPU medium instance" (Xen VM) Windows Server 2003 1.7GB 1x dual-core 2.3GHz (Intel E5345) 1 region with sailing race course 7 avs, 4 in boats scripted start line Castle Rock, OSGrid

Performance studies

These are technical studies, but they do provide some interesting data on the performance limitations of OpenSim at various points in time.

Specific performance hints

Here are some specific things you might be able to do to improve performance

Running Squid on your region server as a reverse proxy to the asset server

1. Download and install the Squid Proxy from: http://www.squid-cache.org/Download/
2. Create your squid.conf configuration file.
3. Change your asset_server configuration in your OpenSim.ini to point to http://localhost:3128/
4. Start everything up!

Now assets will be cached in the squid cache on the region server, and will be served up much faster, especially on region restart.

GC_NO_EXPLICIT

Sometimes this patch applied to mono-svn has helped my sim run a lot faster and not slowly get bogged down.

$mono-svn-root$/mono

 mono/metadata/boehm-gc.c
Index: boehm-gc.c
===================================================================
--- boehm-gc.c	(revision 105684)
+++ boehm-gc.c	(working copy)
@@ -107,6 +107,10 @@
 void
 mono_gc_collect (int generation)
 {
+	static int no_explicite_gc = 0; if (no_explicite_gc==0) {if (getenv("GC_NO_EXPLICIT")) {no_explicite_gc = 1;return;} else {no_explicite_gc = 2;}} else if (no_explicite_gc==1) {
+		g_print("\n --------GC_NO_EXPLICIT \n");
+		return;
+		}
 	MONO_PROBE_GC_BEGIN (generation);
 	
 	GC_gcollect ();

Not only this, but I recompile the mono runtime:

--with-large-heap=yes

Otherwise, the Sim is limited to 3GB RAM. Probably, this second peice is more important. But still, afterwards it's worth a shot to test with both to see if there is a difference in performance:

export GC_NO_EXPLICIT=1

and

unset GC_NO_EXPLICIT

What I think, (only a guess) is that Mono starts internally GC thrashing in fishing expeditions to gaining maybe 1k of RAM at time. And by having a large heap (>3GB), it is possible might keep mono less apt to do stop world complete collections as often.

Personal tools
General
About This Wiki