[Opensim-users] Consequences of vicinity

[Diva Canto]

Yes, I think that's a good idea. You may still get cascading problems 
when buffers go down, but at least there's a buffer zone.
But let me emphasize that those buffer zones should run on a different 
opensim instance than the regions that you want relatively stable.

Ralf Haifisch wrote:
> Hi Crista,
>
> Would it be a recommended way to:
>
> Move "productive" regions
> Put a water-region ring around it, on a different server or at least opensim
> instance
>
> ??
>
> That way I would be in control of the inner border behavior and could still
> see what happens on the outer border.
> If the water instance goes down, doesn´t matter..
>
>
> Cheers
> Ralf
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:43:34 -0800
> From: Diva Canto <diva at metaverseink.com>
> Subject: Re: [Opensim-users] Consequences of vicinity
> To: Frank W Sweet <fwsweet at backintyme.com>,
> 	opensim-users at lists.berlios.de
> Message-ID: <49597CC6.1020209 at metaverseink.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> My message about the consequences of vicinity was more towards people 
> who have regions in OSGrid, really, although the situation is generic.
> As we work on inter-sim comms, things will get wild for people having 
> neighbors in OSGrid which they don't control.
> It's cool if people want to help find the problems and fix them; it's 
> not cool if people want stability. For stability, get away from regions 
> which you don't control.
>
> As a heads up, r7891 and above breaks inter-sim communications with 
> older versions.
>
> Crista
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-users mailing list
> Opensim-users at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
>
>