[Opensim-dev] Moving OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1 to Framework

[Justin Clark-Casey]

liu xiaolu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I want to protect OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1 from being 
> removed.
> 
> Things inside "Region" namespace should be dedicated for RegionServer.
> We should make OGS1* only used by RegionServer, so that  
> OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1 can stay.
> 
> If "other components" want to use some of the functions like "get 
> profile", "create user",
> "map block", then these functions should have a more *general* 
> implementation in
> OpenSim.Framework or OpenSim.Comm. and they are share by "other components"
> including OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1.
> 
> The reason is:
> considering security, requests from RegionServer may be attached some 
> identity
> information that only be avaliable in RegionServer - such like "session_id".
> if you want to call "get profile", "create user", "map block" outside 
> RegionServer,
> then "send/recvkey" or "admin token" should be attached.

Okay, so what I'm probably going to do for now is separate out the 
inventory functions used only by the user grid server (create inventory, 
root folders retrieval) into a separate service and implement this both 
in OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local and possibly 
OpenSim.Grid.Communications.OGS1.

I will not move OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1 as of this time.

> 
> 
> 2008/7/23 Justin Clark-Casey <jjustincc at googlemail.com 
> <mailto:jjustincc at googlemail.com>>:
> 
>     Hello folks,
> 
>     In the course of trying to eliminate some duplicate create user
>     code, I've reached a point where it seems to make more
>     sense if most of the classes in
>     OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1 were in new equivalently
>     named Framework packages.
> 
>     This doesn't strike me as unreasonable since most of the classes in
>     there (with the exception of
>     OGS1InterSimCommunications) address service calls that are not
>     necessarily region specific.  For instance, the map calls
>     in OGS1GridServices and the user profile calls in OGS1UserServices
>     could be reused by other .net programs.  In the
>     longer term some further splitting of services may well be desirable
>     (as has been mentioned before).
> 
>     Any objections on moving these packages?  The actual code impact
>     will be minimal since most references are to
>     OpenSim.Framework.Communications anyway.
> 
>     --
>     justincc
>     Justin Clark-Casey
>     http://justincc.wordpress.com
>     _______________________________________________
>     Opensim-dev mailing list
>     Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de <mailto:Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de>
>     https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Lulurun
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev


-- 
justincc
Justin Clark-Casey
http://justincc.wordpress.com