[Opensim-dev] Incompatibilities between libsl 0.2 and 0.3

[Adam Frisby]

I think that's for the best.

Now that the LL protocol is set in stone, we dont really gain much by 
libsl upgrades, we only use libsl for it's packet definitions, and even 
that's something we may internalise depending on how long it takes for 
the 'lite' libsl release to happen.

This does raise a interesting topic though - I think Sean volunteered to 
look at our UDP code at the office hours yesterday. Sean are you still 
up for that little project?

Adam

Tleiades Hax wrote:

> On Nov 8, 2007 8:04 AM, Adam Frisby <adam at gwala.net> wrote:
> 
>>We were going to rewrite our UDP code anyway.
>>
>>Let's wait for the mini-packets-only libsl to be released, and use that
>>combined with a rewritten UDP engine.
>>
>>Adam
> 
> :-(
> 
> I seems to be the mantra of my efforts to upgrade the version of
> libsl. Everytime I try to do that, something shows up, which makes it
> impossible to do, lets ponder life's big questions.
> 
> p=np?
> libsl=havoc?
> 
> :-)
> ok, I'll kill branch in library svn, and roll back my changes until we
> are ready to move away from the current version of libsl.
> 
> /tleiades
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>