[Opensim-dev] [opensource-dev] TPV & opensim

[Dzonatas Sol]

Given this setup. It would look like this:

[ viewer <-> opensim ] <-> [ opensim <-> viewer ]

That's peer to peer.

Let's say somebody wants to setup a 3D website inside one. They don't 
want to go through ICANN because it's "virtual" just like "virtual 
linden" currency.

They want "http://media.on.a.prim.region.open.sim" as their website.

They point and click, create object, select media prefs, enter website 
address, they get the TLD automatically, no hassle to reg with ICANN for 
every prim they create. And, no need to have a static server, any other 
simulator may connect to their simulator and find their website.  That 
way someone may "buy" their prim, take it to another world, and use it 
there, and the website still works and knows how to resolve addresses.


Dahlia Trimble wrote:
> I have been experimenting with combining and/or offloading physics 
> simulations on physics capable clients (not LL based) with OpenSim, 
> but nothing has been released as open source as of yet. It's not clear 
> to me how a new TLD would affect this though, or why it might be 
> required.
>
> -Dahlia
> (Core)
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas at gmail.com 
> <mailto:dzonatas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I thought this was quite of interest for viewer developers that
>     might ever be interested to attach a simulator to their viewer in
>     order to dispel latency.
>
>     --- snip ---
>
>     If one opensim box connects to another opensim box, that is,
>     technically, peer to peer.
>
>     So, are you saying an opensim box cannot run a client at the same
>     time?
>
>     >Melanie wrote:
>     >Hi,
>
>     >peer to peer simulation is not practical for many different reasons.
>     >Latency being the chief one.
>     >
>     >OpenSim is not going to be a peer to peer system, therefore your
>     >suggestion is off topic. Opensim doesn't need another TLD, and it is
>     >not what you are envisioning. OpenSim firmly embraces the concept of
>     >SERVER SIDE simulation, therefore every sim will always have a
>     >central server.
>     >
>     >I believe this has gone as far as it will go and if there is any
>     >more name calling, well, we'll just have to moderate some people,
>     >won't we?
>     >
>     >Melanie
>     >(Core)
>
>     If one opensim box connects to another opensim box, that is,
>     technically, peer to peer.
>
>     So, are you saying an opensim box cannot run a client at the same
>     time?
>
>     Melanie wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         peer to peer simulation is not practical for many different
>         reasons.
>         Latency being the chief one.
>
>         OpenSim is not going to be a peer to peer system, therefore your
>         suggestion is off topic. Opensim doesn't need another TLD, and
>         it is
>         not what you are envisioning. OpenSim firmly embraces the
>         concept of
>         SERVER SIDE simulation, therefore every sim will always have a
>         central server.
>
>         I believe this has gone as far as it will go and if there is any
>         more name calling, well, we'll just have to moderate some people,
>         won't we?
>
>         Melanie
>         (Core)
>
>
>         �
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>     http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>     Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated
>     posting privileges
>
>