[Opensim-dev] Status of presence refactor?

Mon Feb 22 21:23:23 UTC 2010

*> **How nice of you Mark!*

No problem.  I have plenty of extra hardware and bandwidth.  If you need a
couple of Linux boxes, or Windows Server boxes, just let me know what the
dev's want, what they need, and I can get them setup with some hardware.

Just tell me how many boxes you need, and what you want installed on each of
them, and I can get them done.  I have time this week, so depending on what
you want installed, just give me a day (per box) to get them setup and
configured.  Just give me a list of how many boxes you want, and what you
want installed on them.

            Thanks,

               Mark

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Kyle <create at reactiongrid.com> wrote:

>  How nice of you Mark!
>
>
>
> *From:* opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de [mailto:
> opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de] *On Behalf Of *Mark Malewski
> *Sent:* Monday, February 22, 2010 4:01 PM
>
> *To:* opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> *Subject:* Re: [Opensim-dev] Status of presence refactor?
>
>
>
> Adam/Chris/Melanie/Diva,
>
>
>
> *> since I don't have any Linux machines at my disposal for mono *
>
> *> testing (and my development servers will be going on shipping*
>
> *> containers for a month in the very near future).*
>
>
>
> If you need any hardware just let me know.  I can set a box (or a few
> boxes) up for you, just let me know what you need.  I have about 10 or 12
> servers just sitting here not being used (Quad and Eight core Xeon
> "Nehalem"-based servers with 16+GB or 32+GB of RAM).
>
>
>
> Just let me know what you need, what you want installed on the boxes
> (Ubuntu, Windows Server 2008 R2, etc.) and I can get something setup for you
> that you can use for development/testing and sandbox purposes.
>
>
>
> Just let me know what you want, and I can get something built for you in a
> day or so.  Then I'll give you a root login, and you can do whatever it is
> that you need/want to do (I can setup remote desktop, VPN, or SSH/FTP or
> whatever it is that you may want for remote access/administration).
>
>
>
> Just let me know what OS you want, and what version of Mono you want
> installed (or I can simply just install Ubuntu, or Windows Server 2008 R2 or
> even one server of each, and you can install whatever it is that you want on
> the box after that).
>
>
>
> This way you have a development box (or two) that you can use remotely, and
> you can share with others (if you want) for testing/development purposes.
>  If it will help you, Adam, Melanie, Crista/Diva, by giving you a
> development "sandbox" for a 0.6.9 and 0.7 RC.  This way you can just use the
> box for development, bug testing, bug fixing, refactoring and whatever you
> need to do to help with the upcoming 0.7 RC.
>
>
>
> I could setup a Ubuntu box with SQLite, and also setup a Windows 2008 R2
> box with MySQL so you can test out both the 0.6.9 and future 0.7 RC  (and
> use the hardware platforms for internal development, SQLite & MySQL testing,
> sandboxing and bug testing purposes of the 0.6.9 and RC 0.7)  I don't mind
> hosting the servers, I have the extra equipment and bandwidth for as long as
> you need them (indefinitely).  Just tell me what you want, and give me a day
> to set it up.
>
>
>
> I have the hardware, and I'm offering...
>
>
>
>                 Just let me know,
>
>
>
>                          Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Chris Hart <Chris at codetorque.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> I had said I would look at SQLite but I honestly don't think I will have
> time, plus if there are significant mono-related issues then I am not
> best positioned to work on it in any case, since I don't have any Linux
> machines at my disposal for mono testing (and my development servers
> will be going on shipping containers for a month in the very near
> future).
>
> Personally, I have MSSQL code to finish for presence refactor branch
> (likely a few more days of work there), I would like to get that in if
> there's plans to move forward at some point, but my pieces shouldn't be
> too hard to plug in, unlike something like a core architecture refactor.
>
> I imagine the SOG refactor is going to take some time to work in since
> it's a major piece of work - if that scale of work starts before SQLite
> can be fixed then it will be many more months of waiting for consumers
> who like tagged revisions before a working revision emerges. Is there
> another option here?  Suggest that SQLite users stick to 0.6.8 (even if
> it is semi broken I guess it is better than totally broken), push the
> presence refactor into trunk and continue to plead for more assistance
> on SQLite?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de
> [mailto:opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of
> diva at metaverseink.com
> Sent: 18 February 2010 3:16 PM
> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Status of presence refactor?
>
> Sigh.
> It's ready. It's been fully operational for several weeks, modulo
> buglets. It hasn't been merged because the SQLite connector hasn't been
> redone and at least Melanie doesn't want to merge without it.
>
> For me, the SQLite connector continues to be a big question mark.
> There's the show-stopper bug with mono 2.4.3+, which Teravus has been
> spending an enormous amount of time trying to fix, without success so
> far. And then there's writing the code for the new tables, which I might
>
> attempt doing if absolutely no one else comes forward; but if I do it,
> it won't be pretty, and that code risks going outdated again. I just
> don't know enough about SQLite to do it properly in the amount of time I
>
> have to OpenSim.
>
> Adam, I hate to suggest this, but you could start your SOG refactor in
> that branch already. John Hurliman is doing his other implementation of
> the resource services using that branch.
>
> Frisby, Adam wrote:
> > Does anyone know what is the current status of the presence refactor -
>
> > is there any date on when that is going to hit trunk?
> >
> >
> >
> > I'd really like to see 0.7 get tagged soon, so we can begin the big
> > object model refactor.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensim-dev mailing list
> > Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2683 - Release Date: 02/17/10
> 22:30:00
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2701 - Release Date: 02/22/10
> 02:34:00
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-dev/attachments/20100222/efcc7bea/attachment-0001.html>