[Opensim-dev] The notion of "core"

[Teravus Ovares]

You seem to have some negative feelings about us.   You have your own
fork though that you manage..   called Taiga.   Are you saying that
you involve the community for all decisions about Taiga including who
gets commit rights?    I seriously doubt it.

This is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Regards

Teravus

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Ryan McDougall <sempuki1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Dr Scofield <DrScofield at xyzzyxyzzy.net> wrote:
>>
>> Ryan McDougall wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Frisby, Adam <adam at deepthink.com.au> wrote:
>>>> I disagree.
>>>>
>>>> * Commit Rights - those discussions cannot occur in public (although the discussion archives are open to committers after being invited), the reason for this is no-one can be frank & honest without hurting people's feelings.
>>>
>>> Firstly, I did waive discussion for commit access. I also waive money
>>> and legal matters.
>>>
>>> Secondly, I disagree with the logic of the link, as it's premised
>>> entirely on being honest might hurt someone's feelings. Honesty is not
>>> a function of secrecy.
>>
>> i think honesty can be a facilitated by a discussion remaining confidential.
>>
>>> And the case of "there was a long drawn out
>>> discussion about me in which I was not able to represent my myself"
>>> causing hurt feelings is not considered.
>>
>> i can see that point, but i can also see the points made by adam respectively
>> the points made in the F/OSS guidebook --- in balance (my personal one) i'd
>> rather have core committers discuss whether i should have voting rights in private.
>>
>>>
>>> Thirdly, I don't think snowcrash thing is about giving him commit
>>> access. I don't think things are as neatly compartmentalized as is
>>> told (though I could be wrong, it's hard to guess from a secret
>>> mailing list).
>>
>> no, you are right on that one. it's a discussion about our understanding of
>> licensing issues and whether there is indeed an issue here or not.
>
> In that case, unless core is comprised of lawyers, or confidential
> legal advice is being directly quoted, it might be healthier to
> discuss in public -- at least so it's readable by those who have a
> stake in the community.
>
> Every community/OSS book that mentions private lists for limited use,
> in the next breath cautions against over-use.
>
>> re compartmentalized: they are, at least we try very hard to.
>>
>>        DrS
>> --
>> dr dirk husemann ---- virtual worlds research ---- ibm zurich research lab
>> SL: dr scofield ---- drscofield at xyzzyxyzzy.net ---- http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/
>> RL: hud at zurich.ibm.com - +41 44 724 8573 - http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~hud/
>
> Thanks for all the information -- it makes one feel in the loop an
> having a voice.
>
> Cheers,
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>