[Opensim-dev] Proposal: Light-weight Release Cycle

[Melanie]

27 is what the LL viewer expects, AFAIK.

Melanie

Stefan Andersson wrote:
> Good point. I actually considered introducing this kind of scheme in the VersionInfo field, but got vexed by the
> 
>  
> 
> "Keep to 27 chars"
> 
>  
> 
> comment.
> 
>  
> 
> Anybody knows about that? Why 27? Would less be critical? More?
> 
> 
> If we can manage it reasonably, I would like to introduce an Enum just tagging release-type to that string.
> 
>  
> 
> Other than that, the revision number should be in there.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Stefan Andersson
> Tribal Media AB
> 
> 
> 
>  
>> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:11:56 -0400
>> From: coyle+opensim at knifejaw.com
>> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Proposal: Light-weight Release Cycle
>> 
>> On 2009-03-11 07:49:46 -0400, stefan at tribalmedia.se wrote:
>> > 7) The "-release" tag is branched to a "-post-fixes" branch for continued
>> > service awaiting the next cycle.
>> 
>> May I request that anything committed to -post-fixes after branching
>> result in an incremented tag (0.6.4.1-release or 0.6.4a-release or
>> something) & accompanying change in VersionInfo.cs? Otherwise one
>> has no way of knowing whether someone is running the tagged release
>> or one of the versions that came out of the -post-fixes branch. There
>> was a lot of confusion in #opensim with 0.6.3 because changes were
>> committed to the -post-fixes branch but the versions both before and
>> after the commit were referred to as "0.6.3".
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> -Coyle
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensim-dev mailing list
>> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev