[Opensim-dev] WG: Legal Issues was RFC Profiles

Mike Dickson mike.dickson at hp.com
Wed Apr 1 14:16:57 UTC 2009


On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:05 +0000, James Stallings II wrote:
> Actually Mike,
> 
> 
> I am going to have to agree with you 100% on this. I think that from a
> purely architectural standpoint, the ideal is to have as much of all
> functionality in modules as possible :D
> 
> 
> That said, I think it will be next to impossible not to keep the
> source for some of these modules in the source tree if we hope to be
> able to deliver a base set of features via a single invocation of
> svn/tortoise.

Again, this is an ideal to me and the real implementation is somewhere
in the middle.  But I see it kinda like a Linux distro.  Various things
packaged togethor to make an OpenSim "flavor". There's been some work to
do an installer recently, maybe that's the place to pull togethor core +
modules to get to a useable install.  It's completely understandable why
it is what it is now. Just normal evolution of the project.

> 
> So while architecturally it makes all the sense in the world to keep
> such functionality out of core in the strict sense, such discussions
> (and their potential implementations) are IMHO, definitely appropriate
> fodder for discussion here.

I'm not at all against the conversations on the features and their use
cases.  That's high value also and important.  I was (possibly over)
reacting to the notion that changes were required in core to support
this. OpenSim is already a nice extensible framework but I think if the
framework aspect was pushed more to the forefront it could be even
better.

> Cheers!
> James
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson at hp.com>
> wrote:
>         Wnat I'm actually trying to say is that core should be the
>         framework it
>         was intended to be. So rather than put something to support
>         communicating license models for content in core I'd prefer to
>         see it as
>         an add on in forge.  Heck, I'd really honestly prefer
>         hypergrid was the
>         same way. In short I'm advocating putting less in core as
>         opposed to any
>         specific way to handle licensing. I'm fine if someone wants to
>         develop
>         add-on functionality in forge to do that and if others want to
>         download
>         it and enable it on their grid. IMO, thats the right model for
>         functionality of this sort.
>         
>         Mike
>         
>         
>         On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 06:22 +0000, Ralf Haifisch wrote:
>         > Exactly, this and means to identify the creator - even using
>         hypergrid.
>         >
>         > ------------------------------
>         > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:48:57 -0700
>         > From: Dahlia Trimble <dahliatrimble at gmail.com>
>         > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] WG: Legal Issues was RFC Profiles
>         > To: mike.dickson at hp.com, opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>         > Message-ID:
>         >
>         <ab84ceb10903311548o2146dc26r357bfb928fa1b927 at mail.gmail.com>
>         > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>         >
>         > I don't think anyone is suggesting that OpenSim core should
>         mandate any
>         > licensing scenario, but rather should OpenSim provide any
>         hooks necessary
>         > for content creators to specify asset-specific licenses
>         beyond
>         > Copy/Mod/Transfer. Whether those hooks are functional and
>         whatever defaults
>         > are in place would likely be an installation specific
>         configuration.
>         >
>         > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Mike Dickson
>         <mike.dickson at hp.com> wrote:
>         >
>         > > If as a creator I want to add a notecard to my object
>         indicating the
>         > > licensing terms I want to apply when someone has a copy of
>         or rez's my
>         > > object I'm free to do so.  Heck I could even get fancy and
>         script it
>         > > asking for a click-through menu response or something.
>          I'm not against
>         > > licensing of objects.  Just don't pollute what is IMO an
>         already a tad
>         > > over-complex OpenSim core with it.
>         > >
>         > > Content licensing is a matter for the grid TOS and
>         individual content
>         > > providers on that grid.  Not, IMO something that OpenSIM
>         core needs to
>         > > worry about or address.
>         > >
>         > > Mike
>         > >
>         > > On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:08 +0000, Ralf Haifisch wrote:
>         > > > Dear all,
>         > > >
>         > > > i while ago i went over the legal side of many aspects
>         with 2 lawyer.
>         > > >
>         > > > Since this is a multinational question and in many cases
>         has not
>         > exampels
>         > > > (e.g. no judgments by court) it tends to be a discussion
>         based on
>         > > personal
>         > > > flavor, but not legal facts.
>         > > >
>         > > > And yes, maybe there is enough mud for the whole 3D web.
>         > > >
>         > > > But to come to the point:
>         > > >
>         > > > - I don?t know any country, where having the ability to
>         add a
>         > > > hypergrid-aware note about the creator and a license
>         (hint, url,
>         > > notecard)
>         > > > would have negative impact
>         > > >
>         > > > - I know a few countrys where it would realy help from
>         legal side
>         > > >
>         > > > - it would be a clear sign, that the opensim crew takes
>         care about
>         > > content
>         > > > rights and ownership
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         > > > And yes, this only is another brick in the wall of
>         copyright protection.
>         > > We
>         > > > still have RL laws, we still need secure technical
>         system, rights
>         > > management
>         > > > etc etc...
>         > > >
>         > > > And spoken in sex beds, I am more afraid about the pure
>         mass von
>         > > animations
>         > > > etc - a few more notecards don?t worry me to much.   :-)
>         > > >
>         > > > So - if it is possible somehow, please add it.
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         > > > Just my 2 cent...
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         > > > Cheers,
>         > > > Ralf
>         > > >
>         > >
>         > >
>         > > _______________________________________________
>         > > Opensim-dev mailing list
>         > > Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>         > > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>         > >
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > Opensim-dev mailing list
>         > Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>         > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>         
>         --
>         Mike Dickson <mike.dickson at hp.com>
>         
>         BladeSystem infrastructure R&D
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Opensim-dev mailing list
>         Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>         https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ===================================
> http://osgrid.org
> http://del.icio.us/SPQR
> http://twitter.com/jstallings2
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/5/770/a49
> 
-- 
Mike Dickson <mike.dickson at hp.com>
BladeSystem infrastructure R&D




More information about the Opensim-dev mailing list