[Opensim-dev] OSGrid <-> UCIGrid
Dahlia Trimble
dahliatrimble at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 19:47:52 UTC 2008
Ok I couldn't resist and had to try it. The initial teleport went smoothly,
but I was logged out several times while editing my prim and trying to
compile a llSetText() script. Also I was logged out while in a conversation
there. On my final attempt I was able to teleport there and back to OSGrid
successfully.
An interesting experiment. Congratulations to Diva and her team on their
accomplishment! :)
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM, James Stallings II <
james.stallings at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am glad to see this getting such quick traction. WTG folks :D
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Justin Clark-Casey <
> jjustincc at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Cristina Videira Lopes wrote:
>> > Justin Clark-Casey wrote:
>> >> Strong -1 on committing this code directly to core at this stage.
>> >>
>> >> Charles, I strongly believe it would be better for us to see this
>> mature a little as an external module first, rather
>> >> than committing code directly to core. Please could we hold off at
>> least until the code has reached some level of
>> >> maturity, at which point we can have a discussion about what we want to
>> do.
>> >>
>> > +1 on Justin's -1 :-)
>> > There's no way I would propose the code as is today for a core patch;
>> > there's a lot stuff that is still loose.
>> > But I hope people will want the hypergrid model enough that the
>> > extensions will be delivered on the same "package" as the core, soon.
>> > And I hope there are volunteers from the core developers to help bring
>> > this up to speed!
>>
>> Cool, thanks Cristina, glad to know that we're on the same wavelength :)
>>
>> I'm sure there will be interest from core developers - there has been
>> occasional conversation about looking at
>> alternative ways of doing things. But again, kudos for actually doing
>> something - rough running code is always better
>> than talk :)
>>
>> I'm quite keen myself but unfortunately more prosaic OpenSim server bugs
>> keep hitting me in the face in such a way that
>> I need to fix them for one reason or another.
>>
>> >
>> >> There is also an argument that such modules should eventually be
>> outside the core anyway. The OGP modules we have are
>> >> in there because our region infrastructure module isn't advanced enough
>> to make it easy to host these outside of core.
>> >> This is something we should address (either having some protocol
>> modules in or having them all out).
>> >>
>> > +1 on that too. The hypergrid extension would be even simpler than what
>> > already is if only I could define externally what the comm module is. I
>> > suspect OGP suffers from the same problem.
>> >
>> >> That's not to say that this isn't very interesting work, Cristina.
>> Does the code fit into the module structure?
>> >>
>> > Yes. As I said, the only weirdness comes because I can't spec the comms
>> > module. If you change that, it will be a charm (modulo some visibility
>> > changes here and there).
>>
>> Yep, apologies for not reading your previous e-mail carefully enough.
>> When I get a chance, I'll see if I can look at
>> your code and change the structure such that things are easier in this
>> respect (unless someone else does it first). Of
>> course, a patch to do such a thing is one that would be very welcome and
>> quickly applied too.
>>
>> >> I had thoughts along similar lines for distributed grids.
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://justincc.wordpress.com/2008/08/15/could-there-be-a-future-without-big-grids/
>> >>
>> >> but I never actually implemented anything = so fair do's to Cristina.
>> Also, my thoughts were to conduct everything
>> >> client side.
>> >>
>> >> The problem does some with asset and inventory and routing this
>> information around. My thinking was that it would be
>> >> better if the client fetch this information directly rather than via
>> the sim, but this would require extensive (and
>> >> probably difficult) client changes.
>> >>
>> > A smarter client would make a lot of things a lot easier...
>>
>> God yes. Sometimes I think the fact that it is GPL'd has been a blessing
>> in disguise - it allows us to implement a lot
>> of OpenSim without accompanying time spent thinking about the client. But
>> it seems that things are getting to the stage
>> where the restrictions are as painful as they are beneficial.
>>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Opensim-dev mailing list
>> > Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>> > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> justincc
>> Justin Clark-Casey
>> http://justincc.wordpress.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensim-dev mailing list
>> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ===================================
> The wind
> scours the earth for prayers
> The night obscures them
>
> http://osgrid.org
> http://del.icio.us/SPQR
> http://twitter.com/jstallings2
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/5/770/a49
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-dev/attachments/20081030/ef788f0b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Opensim-dev
mailing list