[Opensim-dev] hypergrid status
Justin Clark-Casey
jjustincc at googlemail.com
Thu Nov 13 14:29:31 UTC 2008
Michael Wright wrote:
> +1000000.
>
> I think we all/most want to see core smaller than it is. Its just
> getting to the point of having stable API's so we can start moving
> things out.
>
> And totally agree that we should do more to get the message out that
> opensim is a platform, that just has a reference application included
> that makes it act basically like SL.
+lots
I think to some extent this is also pending a revision of the region module system to make it easy to plug in external
modules with their own configuration files (OpenSim.ini.example is getting to be a monster). Of course, we've been
saying that for ages now - consider it a long feature lead up :)
I've never actually tried to build a completely external region module myself so perhaps it's not as tough as I think.
Cristina, your forge code will provide a good example of this (assuming that you have region modules).
Of course, from your work it sounds like there are also framework areas that could be better modularized.
>
>
>
> */Cristina Videira Lopes <lopes at ics.uci.edu>/* wrote:
>
> Gosh, I don't know how many more times I have to say this: the
> opensim API is just wonderful! Just look at the hypergrid code, and
> you will see. It's all done via inheritance, delegation, and region
> modules. Rather than looking at it as an annoyance, I have found it
> to be an exciting constraint to code it up with minimum interference
> on the core. All patches I have submitted in the last couple of
> weeks have been to make things friendly for subclassing, that's all.
>
> My only comment to you core developers is that I see several things
> in the core that probably shouldn't be there. Cores should be as
> small as possible.
>
> When people finally realize that opensim is only casually an
> application that looks like SL but, more importantly, a framework
> that can be extended, I think we will start to see a lot more
> deviation from SL. The message is still not out there. (I promised
> to put out my traffic sim code as an example, but then the hypergrid
> got control over me...)
>
> Diva / Crista
>
> stefan at tribalmedia.se wrote:
>> Quoting James Stallings II <james.stallings at gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>>> This is the interoperability fast-track - I love it.
>>>
>>
>> Personally, I love the fact that Diva claims it's all been very simple
>> to code, due to the modularity and malleability of OpenSim. We should
>> all pat ourselves on the back and keep the torch of decoupling high
>> wherever we run.
>>
>> <3
>>
>> /Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensim-dev mailing list
>> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
--
justincc
Justin Clark-Casey
http://justincc.wordpress.com
More information about the Opensim-dev
mailing list