[Opensim-dev] Moving OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1 to Framework

Frisby, Adam adam at deepthink.com.au
Tue Jul 22 18:18:03 UTC 2008


I don't think Framework is an appropriate place since it is an implementation not an interface.

Perhaps OpenSim.Communications.OGS1 is a more appropriate namespace?

Adam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
> bounces at lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Justin Clark-Casey
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:17 AM
> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> Subject: [Opensim-dev] Moving OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1
> to Framework
>
> Hello folks,
>
> In the course of trying to eliminate some duplicate create user code,
> I've reached a point where it seems to make more
> sense if most of the classes in
> OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1 were in new equivalently named
> Framework packages.
>
> This doesn't strike me as unreasonable since most of the classes in
> there (with the exception of
> OGS1InterSimCommunications) address service calls that are not
> necessarily region specific.  For instance, the map calls
> in OGS1GridServices and the user profile calls in OGS1UserServices
> could be reused by other .net programs.  In the
> longer term some further splitting of services may well be desirable
> (as has been mentioned before).
>
> Any objections on moving these packages?  The actual code impact will
> be minimal since most references are to
> OpenSim.Framework.Communications anyway.
>
> --
> justincc
> Justin Clark-Casey
> http://justincc.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev



More information about the Opensim-dev mailing list