[Opensim-dev] Stable Branch pt III Was: RFC: Changing default script engine to xengine

[Frisby, Adam]

Ah I thought that was tied to DNE. I guess let Tedd answer here then.

Adam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
> bounces at lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Melanie
> Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2008 6:58 PM
> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Stable Branch pt III Was: RFC: Changing
> default script engine to xengine
>
> Actually, Tedd has started what is really a new project, a new
> engine, not an extension to the existing DotNetEngine. It's not
> currently functional.
> This doesn't pertain to the current DotNetEngine, which has no
> module loading ability whatsoever.
>
> Melanie
>
> Frisby, Adam wrote:
> > I believe the reasoning is that DNE has the ability to modularise and
> replace components in it - Tedd is still actively working on some of
> those, including trying to get microthreading running.
> >
> > From: opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
> bounces at lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Nebadon Izumi
> > Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2008 9:03 AM
> > To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Stable Branch pt III Was: RFC: Changing
> default script engine to xengine
> >
> > I run primarily windows and find Dozens more issues with Dotnetengine
> on Windows, to myself Dotnetengine is 100% unuseable in 100% of my
> sims, why we keep babying this virtually non-supported module is beyond
> me, Xengine needs to be made the primary only if because virtually no
> one supports Dotnetengine, other than to try their best to bring its
> functionality to that which Xengine has reached, but i cant remember
> the last time Dotnetengine did something more and better than Xengine
> does, i dont think theres ever been a case where dotnetengine
> outpeformed or was more stable than Xengine.  And back to the reason
> why i responded, Windows runs monumentally better on Xengine than
> Dotnetengine, and thats my two cents.
> >
> >
> > Neb
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Justin Clark-Casey
> <jjustincc at googlemail.com<mailto:jjustincc at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> > Stefan Andersson wrote:
> >>
> >> So, should we take this up to the vote then? I'd say that we want a
> >> period of stbailizing before switching to XEngine.
> > To be honest, I think a fair few of us have been using XEngine for a
> good few months now, so the chances of instability
> > are fairly minimal.  Though perhaps most of us doing this have been
> on the Linux side with not so much testing on
> > Windows (judging from one of Teravus' earlier posts about read
> conflicts of compiled script assemblies).
> >
> > --
> > justincc
> > Justin Clark-Casey
> > http://justincc.wordpress.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensim-dev mailing list
> > Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de<mailto:Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de>
> > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensim-dev mailing list
> > Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev