[Opensim-dev] Stable Branch pt III Was: RFC: Changing default script engine to xengine

[Nebadon Izumi]

I run primarily windows and find Dozens more issues with Dotnetengine on
Windows, to myself Dotnetengine is 100% unuseable in 100% of my sims, why we
keep babying this virtually non-supported module is beyond me, Xengine needs
to be made the primary only if because virtually no one supports
Dotnetengine, other than to try their best to bring its functionality to
that which Xengine has reached, but i cant remember the last time
Dotnetengine did something more and better than Xengine does, i dont think
theres ever been a case where dotnetengine outpeformed or was more stable
than Xengine.  And back to the reason why i responded, Windows runs
monumentally better on Xengine than Dotnetengine, and thats my two cents.


Neb

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Justin Clark-Casey <
jjustincc at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Stefan Andersson wrote:
> >
> > So, should we take this up to the vote then? I'd say that we want a
> > period of stbailizing before switching to XEngine.
>
> To be honest, I think a fair few of us have been using XEngine for a good
> few months now, so the chances of instability
> are fairly minimal.  Though perhaps most of us doing this have been on the
> Linux side with not so much testing on
> Windows (judging from one of Teravus' earlier posts about read conflicts of
> compiled script assemblies).
>
> --
> justincc
> Justin Clark-Casey
> http://justincc.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-dev/attachments/20081211/0dc3d241/attachment-0001.html>