<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/09/2014 03:19 PM, Serendipity
Seraph wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CANWh17n7sdKYmLBTD_OH689NZuT0+BXLVwirex=VVXzRSSjw6g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">The open metaverse seriously needs grid independent
asset storage with replication, failover and scalability.
Another approach is to tie assets owned to the owner in some
kind of per user cloud or local machine only backed storage. Or
at least have such as backups. It is an interesting set of
challenges - and opportunities.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
Also identity. Some of that was discussed in a standards effort a
while ago but it got derailed for lots of reason. But yes I'd agree
there is room for providing parts of the overall infrastructure with
trust relationships defined between services. Any hypergrid isn't
that as its implemented today.<br>
<br>
Mike<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CANWh17n7sdKYmLBTD_OH689NZuT0+BXLVwirex=VVXzRSSjw6g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Ai
Austin <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ai.ai.austin@gmail.com" target="_blank">ai.ai.austin@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">At 10:35
07/01/2014, Jeff Kelley wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
HG visitors will lose ownership on their objects (that
happens to me every time a friend zaps his grid).<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I noticed this (very worrying) comment in a discussion on
tidying up growing asset data bases...<br>
<br>
It will surely not be uncommon for grids to be tidied up,
reinitialized, restored or to disappear entirely.<br>
<br>
It ought not to be the case that any objects obtained with
appropriate permission over a HG connection or visit can
disappear from a grid they are currently on. If that is the
way it is currently works we will have serious problems with
builds disappearing or getting broken. Do HG transferred
objects rely on their continuing availability on the
continuing availability and access to the origination grid?
I certainly hope not... I would expect a standa lonw copy
that can exist independently to be available on the
destination grid forever independently of the origination
grid availability.<br>
<br>
Can someone who knows the protocol comment and reassure us
that all is well in HG asset transfer land? Maybe Diva
could comment? We can then report bugs in what is meant to
happen if items are disappearing for some users when the
origination grid is changed or lost.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Opensim-users mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Opensim-users@lists.berlios.de"
target="_blank">Opensim-users@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users"
target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Opensim-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Opensim-users@lists.berlios.de">Opensim-users@lists.berlios.de</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>