I would point out that I did give a helpful link to the the original question (Drupal does run on Windows, my link was to their page)<br><br>My use of the word "real" is because Free Software is Computer *Science* - open experiments with all the evidence available to all researchers. <br>
The opposite is the guild system where knowledge is hoarded and no one outside the guild is allowed to know how things are done. It is unnatural and requires the use of force (legal penalties) to impose. It slows down the advancement of knowledge.<br>
You don't need source code to break an operating system - Microsoft has demonstrated that beyond debate.<br>You do need source code to fix it. <br>
<br><br>
looking at James comment <br>
<div><br>
1. Pick your application</div>
<div>2. Pick the language that best implements it</div>
<div>3. Pick the best operating system that supports it (natively is to be preferred)</div>
<div>4. pick the hardware that runs that operating system<br>
<br>
OpenSim is being tied to Windows due to the use of .net (I agree with James parenthetical statement)<br>
Mono is open, but it is a potential landmine of patent liability, which is why it has been dropped from Fedora/Red Hat.<br>
That loss of userbase/mindshare impacts on the development of Mono. <br><br>
I'm pleased to hear that the garbage collection is being improved, but by design, Mono is locked into playing catch up against .net<br></div>
As a result, the roadmap of a critical component belongs to a company
that has their own agenda, and it may not support your project<br><div class="gmail_quote">
Having an open project dependent on a closed OS introduces a point of failure, outside of the developers control.<br> <br>Suggesting nefarious scheming on the part of Microsoft is not unreasonable, given the company's history - from the days of the DR-DOS lawsuit to the theft of code from Plurk and the whole fuss over stolen XML code in their office suite back at the begining of this year. If Mono is an intentional landmine this project would be among the casualties, not even noticed in the larger scheme of things.<br>
<br><br>On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Ric Moore <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wayward4now@gmail.com">wayward4now@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 08:31 +0200, jabbaah wrote:<br>
> You've got it - the world is black-and-white:<br>
><br>
> Linux is good,<br>
> Windows is bad.<br>
<br>
</div>I certainly never stated that. I happen to not like Windows as MY OS and<br>
I was very careful to state it was a personal preference. Anyone is free<br>
to use whatever blows up their dress.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> That's all.<br>
><br>
> Nope, back to reality: I am working as a freelance IT professional for<br>
> years now.<br>
> If you have to install a new system for a specific task you'll have to<br>
> decide which<br>
> operating system will be used. There are typical tasks which will lead<br>
> you to a linux/unix/solaris<br>
> installation and there are other jobs which will lead to a windows<br>
> installation.<br>
> Not to forget that there are typical os/x tasks which will lead to an<br>
> xserve installation<br>
> or something similar (sometimes hardware dependant).<br>
><br>
> Back to OpenSim: You have the choice. I guess we don't have a 'typical'<br>
> OpenSim<br>
> installation. Linux or Windows. Your own decision. Both are as good as<br>
> the other.<br>
><br>
> Nothing bad about windows - but usually (if you rent a server) a few bucks<br>
> more expensive than a linux box (due to license cost). That's all.<br>
> But that's not a question of quality. If you'd use Red Hat Linux you had to<br>
> pay license fees, too.<br>
<br>
</div>In Red Hat's case, as I used to work there, you're paying for the<br>
service per license but never for the software. Bob Young hired me back<br>
when, mostly to be the Goat amongst his 20 somethings Thoroughbreds, not<br>
because I was a coder whizbang propeller head. If you don't need the<br>
service, then CentOS can be installed for free. Again, that's bare<br>
knucks, but makes for one tough server.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Far more important is bandwidth of internet connection, latency,<br>
> size of ram, disk speed, number of cpu cores.<br>
<br>
</div>I most certainly concur with that. I'd give anything to tap the Sprint<br>
fiber optic cable that runs through our front yard, it's a major route<br>
on the net's backbone. When I asked how much to connect, I got an<br>
offhand "several grand a month ...or so". It goes from DC to Blackstone<br>
VA down to Duke and UNC in North Carolina. Sweet. Probably the same line<br>
that MS and Apple are tied into. Ric<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:<br>
"There are two Great Sins in the world...<br>
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.<br>
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.<br>
Linux user# 44256<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">Opensim-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Opensim-users@lists.berlios.de">Opensim-users@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>