[Opensim-users] Anyone recognise versanet.de or 94.135.203.122
John Sheridan
john at pseudospace.net
Fri Jan 23 00:30:40 UTC 2015
I wonder if there's a way to hook into a region module? I've seen some
sims that announce "There are now 1 visitors in the region!" when you
teleport in. Perhaps there's a way to hook into that which would allow
for the gates to update on mass after a user comes in?
On 01/22/2015 05:13 PM, Gwyneth Llewelyn wrote:
> Maybe it could be done with a collision event instead of a sensor?
> When an avatar collides with invisible sphere (with a 10-20m radius),
> you know someone is near your gate, so you can start polling.
>
> - Gwyn
>
>> On 22 Jan 2015, at 21:15 , Shaun T. Erickson <ste at smxy.org
>> <mailto:ste at smxy.org>> wrote:
>>
>> 1) We don't know that it's a hypergate at all - we just surmised that
>> it might be. 2) As for my gates not checking if no one is near it,
>> well, that never occurred to me, to be honest. Wouldn't that require
>> an active scanner of some sort that would chew up CPU, constantly
>> looking for someone nearby? If so, then a simple blind check, once an
>> hour, would be less costly, yes? If not, then perhaps it's something
>> I should consider adding to mine.
>>
>> -ste
>>
>> On 1/22/15 2:13 PM, Serendipity Seraph wrote:
>>> If it is a hypergate then why should it bother to check at all if no
>>> avatar is within a certain distance of it? Once and hour or less
>>> seems more than reasonable.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Shaun T. Erickson <ste at smxy.org
>>> <mailto:ste at smxy.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's not mine. Mine is the other one he mentioned: 65.78.40.167.
>>>
>>> -ste
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/11/15 1:15 PM, Diva Canto wrote:
>>>
>>> Ai's log shows a probe originating from the same IP address
>>> (94.135.203.122) every minute and a half. If this address is
>>> yours, please consider dialing this down. If I see this
>>> level of spam coming into my grids, I will block the
>>> originating IP.
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2015 9:50 AM, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
>>>
>>> As do my gates - hence 24 times a day. That's very low.
>>> But if many people are using a copy of your teleporter
>>> or my gate and have them configured to, say, a popular
>>> grid, then they will of course, see a lot more than 24 a
>>> day. Or maybe there's someone out there who made a
>>> device that checks more often than ours ...
>>>
>>> -ste
>>>
>>> On 1/11/15 12:38 PM, Diva Canto wrote:
>>>
>>> My teleporting device probes every hour.
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2015 9:34 AM, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
>>>
>>> I got that feature from *your* teleport booth,
>>> Diva. :)
>>>
>>> I don't think my address pinging another 24
>>> times in one day is a lot, really. However, if
>>> you get tons doing that, then perhaps.
>>>
>>> -ste
>>>
>>> On 1/11/15 12:17 PM, Diva Canto wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it's a lot. Ppl writing these
>>> hypergates should be a little more
>>> restrained. There's no need to spam.
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2015 9:00 AM, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/11/15 5:53 AM, Ai Austin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: "Shaun T. Erickson"
>>> <ste at smxy.org <mailto:ste at smxy.org>>
>>>
>>> What kind of traffic is it? My
>>> Blamgates check their
>>> destinations once
>>> an hour - perhaps they are doing
>>> something similar, but at a greater
>>> frequency? Just a wild guess,
>>> though.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Shauin, and yes from the port
>>> numbers begin used I expect it is
>>> indeed some scripts to check for
>>> things benign alive or pinging
>>> hypergates, etc.
>>>
>>> I wondered if anyone recognized the
>>> 191 second interval as well as the
>>> IP address.
>>>
>>> Once an hour is not too bad.. and I
>>> see four or five such IP addresses
>>> one of which might be your blam gate
>>> for us.. e.g. 65.78.40.167
>>>
>>> But every 191 seconds means my
>>> Robust.exe console is now full up
>>> with these debug messages when I
>>> check things every so often... yes I
>>> know I can turn that down to INFO
>>> only being shown..
>>>
>>> Samples below... !!
>>>
>>> 08:55:32 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> from 94.135.203.122:63188
>>> <http://94.135.203.122:63188/>
>>> 08:57:53 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> from 94.135.203.122:63260
>>> <http://94.135.203.122:63260/>
>>> [SNIP]
>>>
>>> >Once an hour is not too bad.. and I see
>>> four or five such IP addresses one of
>>> which might be your blam gate for us..
>>> e.g. 65.78.40.167
>>>
>>> Yes, that's my address. :)
>>>
>>> You think every 191 seconds is a lot? My
>>> grid sees one of these every few seconds:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> 11:33:34 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:33:37 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:33:40 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:33:44 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:33:48 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:33:52 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:33:55 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:34:07 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:34:14 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:34:16 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:34:23 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:34:26 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:34:46 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:34:49 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:34:53 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:34:58 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:01 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:08 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:14 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:15 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:17 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:27 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:30 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:39 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:45 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:35:48 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> 11:36:12 - [Wifi]: DefaultRequest
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I can't see who they're from, however.
>>> I'm guessing that was added since
>>> December 5th, which is the last time I
>>> updated my production grid (or maybe I
>>> need to set something, so the addresses
>>> show).
>>>
>>> Given that my grid has a region that's a
>>> popular HG hub, and that many people
>>> have taken copies of the gate I have
>>> out, that's configured to bring them to
>>> my grid, I imagine that some of what I'm
>>> seeing are those gates checking to see
>>> that my grid is up. However, I think the
>>> majority of it (in addition to the ~80
>>> gates to other grids) is likely to be
>>> the "roller-coaster" I have set up in
>>> that region ... I have 100 Blamgates,
>>> laying horizontally, up in the sky.
>>> There is a gate on the ground, that
>>> rezzes you just above the first of them,
>>> and you fall into it. Then it sends you
>>> to just above the next one, and so on,
>>> until you get to the last gate which
>>> puts you back where you started. It's
>>> quite a wild ride that lasts for about a
>>> minute. :) Anyway, all of them are of
>>> the "check the destination" type of
>>> gate, so I imagine I'm doing most of it
>>> to myself. :) Oh, if you ever want to
>>> try the roller-coaster, look for the
>>> gate labelled "101", in Eld2. :)
>>>
>>> What might be nice is a simple way of
>>> turning off just this one message.
>>>
>>> -ste
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Opensim-users mailing list
>>> Opensim-users at opensimulator.org
>>> <mailto:Opensim-users at opensimulator.org>
>>> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Opensim-users mailing list
>>> Opensim-users at opensimulator.org
>>> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensim-users mailing list
>> Opensim-users at opensimulator.org <mailto:Opensim-users at opensimulator.org>
>> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-users mailing list
> Opensim-users at opensimulator.org
> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-users/attachments/20150122/b7abb649/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Opensim-users
mailing list