[Opensim-users] Load Testing OpenSim

[Karen Palen]

One of the advantages of open source it that Radegast can indeed go into
"never never land" (as Second Life appears to be doing), BUT the existing
code can be "forked" to provide the capability needed.

My feeling is that the Radegast devs would be delighted to have this kind of
acceptance of their work, especially if people were to do the "heavy
lifting" of generating and providing working code to the project. However if
I am wrong the "fork" is always an option!

(Hmmmm, a "fork" sounds like some sort of nasty torture device doesn't it?
... HERETIC! you may either be BURNED at the stake or "forked" -
ARRRGGGGHHH!)

Karen

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Robert Klein <rtkwebman at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> My biggest concern would be what if Radegast decides to go in another
> direction with their product? It would be safer to go with something we
> have
> more control over. If we use a random function will we get random results?
> I
> am not a testing guru but imho it seems like we should have a certain
> number
> of things doing a certain number of things from a certain point to another
> certain point or something like that. :)
>
> Anyone out there who is deeply involved in testing and QA have an opinion
> on
> what we should be doing?
>
> -Robert
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://opensim-users.2152040.n2.nabble.com/Load-Testing-OpenSim-tp5197654p5214808.html
> Sent from the opensim-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-users mailing list
> Opensim-users at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-users/attachments/20100623/c068bbd5/attachment.html>