[Opensim-users] Opensim-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 56

Justin Clark-Casey jjustincc at googlemail.com
Fri Jan 30 19:11:38 UTC 2009


Mo Hax wrote:
>     Just to note, missing features from the Linden Labs Second Life
>     viewer (e.g.
>     groups support), are considered feature
>     requests rather than bugs - these shouldn't go in the mantis.
> 
> 
> Where do feature requests get tracked then? I submitted some missing 
> llGetAnimation() states as a Mantis but you have me thinking maybe those 
> are features rather than OSSL/LSL bugs.

In this particular case I would regard missing llGetAnimation() states as a bug (since some of the method is 
implemented) rather than a feature.

I think the consensus was to track features as requests on the mailing list.  However, this really may have been geared 
towards big features (e.g. anonymous avatars) rather than small ones (e.g. implementation of some missing ll function).

Thinking about it, I would err to continuing to place small features on the Mantis since they'll just get lost on the 
lists.  If people disagree then hopefully we can get to some new consensus.

-- 
justincc
Justin Clark-Casey
http://justincc.wordpress.com



More information about the Opensim-users mailing list