<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
dr scofield wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4ADC9F3E.7020606@xyzzyxyzzy.net" type="cite"><!----><br>
<pre wrap="">to me this is another piece from the legal FUD department (reminiscent
of the "money" discussions).
</pre>
</blockquote>
It's very easy to brush difficult issues under the rug of "I don't
care, this is ethics, not technical, hence it's FUD". You're entitled
to that stand. Give your -1 on whatever is being proposed and stay out
of the rest of the conversation, instead of trying to "FUD the FUD."
Some of us care about these difficult issues. Having a co-copyright
holder who releases an addon to opensim under a discriminatory license
(in this case based on country, but could be based on race, gender,
sexual orientation,...) is not something some of us can ignore. Unclear
if/what we should do about it, but clear that this is bugging a lot of
people, not just core devs, and hence it should be discussed not
ignored.<br>
<br>
Crista<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>