<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14pt"><div>Well, this may or may not be, Melanie. But, I would feel a whole lot more comfortable about the whole proposal *after* at least two different groups report success in configuring BUST and that it is not busted.<br><br>At that point, we need enough clear and concise documentation on the wiki to allow others running grids to be able to change. After a half dozen different grids have adopted the notion of BUST and determined it is not busted, then we could consider deprecating our existing UGAIM.<br><br>Charles<br></div><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14pt;"><br><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Melanie <melanie@t-data.com><br><b><span
style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, July 8, 2009 8:13:04 AM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Opensim-dev] Deprecate OpenSim.Grid.InventoryServer and OpenSim.Grid.AssetServer?<br></font><br>
B.U.S.T. is Basic Universal Server Technology. The prompt can be <br>changed in the configuration file, though, for those without a sense <br>of humor. I fully expect things to get renamed before 1.0. On the <br>other hand, the server is named OpenSim.Server.exe, no body parts there!<br><br>As soon as connectors are available for the other services, it will <br>be able to run them. Part of this is getting the old servers out of <br>the way, since the new servers use different web protocols and <br>keeping compatibility with the old servers will not be possible. At <br>this point, the presence of the old servers blocks evolution.<br><br>Melanie<br><br><br>Sean Dague wrote:<br>> Melanie wrote:<br>>> The CB version we have in trunk is another implementation of similar <br>>> concepts. It has some hooks for some features, which were never <br>>> implemented, that the new system doesn't have yet, but the modular <br>>> system make
them entirely possible.<br>>> <br>>> At this point, the CB in trunk is stagnant. It's a stripped down <br>>> version that is already incompatible with upstream CB and <br>>> essentially unmaintained. I doubt anyone uses it and would think it <br>>> could also be dropped or moved.<br>> <br>> I'm definitely in favor of getting stuff out of trunk that we think<br>> isn't getting used at all, eliminates confusion in the code.<br>> <br>> Can we come up with a name better than BUST though, as that doesn't<br>> really mean anything to me? :) Unrelated question, is it possible to<br>> run all the grid services (not just inv & asset) via that 1 process?<br>> That would simplify things for smaller (< 50 region) grids that probably<br>> put all those on the same machine anyway.<br>> <br>> -Sean<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Opensim-dev mailing list<br>> <a ymailto="mailto:Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de" href="mailto:Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de">Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>> <a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Opensim-dev mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de" href="mailto:Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de">Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br><a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev</a><br></div></div></div></body></html>