<div dir="ltr">Or, we might simply apply the patch to some test regions outside of svn and see how it flies. To me, that qualifies as a test.<br><br>Personally, I think we're out on a bit of a limb here, as several of us have already personally commited to testing this patch. If it were going to cause such angst at this stage of the process, it would have been nice to know there were such reservations before that happened.<br>
<br>Cheers,<br>James<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Charles Krinke <<a href="mailto:cfk@pacbell.net">cfk@pacbell.net</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">In the past, our strategy for applying patches has been:<br><br>1) They apply. <br>
2) They compile <br>3) They do not cause angst amongst core developers <br>4) They do not cause complaints about things breaking from users.<br><br>This strategy has been able to keep us from branching at the cost of some chaos from time to time.<br>
<br>If the interop patch does not make it past item 3, so be it. But, maybe there is a subset of the interop patch that can be rationalized meets all four criteria.<br><font color="#888888"><br>Charles<br><br></font><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">----- Original Message ----<br>From: Sean Dague <<a href="mailto:sean@dague.net" target="_blank">sean@dague.net</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de" target="_blank">opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
</div><div class="Ih2E3d">Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:24:12
AM<br>Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Inteop patch Mantis#1696<br><br></div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:08:56PM +0200, Dr Scofield wrote:<br>> Frisby, Adam wrote:<br>> > I maintain that committing to a branch is going to be the most useful over the life of this patch. Mainly because people want to use OpenSim+1696 to test the AWG specs, and having a ready-to-use version that doesn't require fiddling is likely going to be useful to some folks.<br>
> ><br>> > Adam<br>> > <br>> branch would be fine with me. trunk: not yet.<br><br>Just say no to svn branches!<br><br>Honestly, if this stuff isn't tracking with trunk, then it's useless.<br>
Every use of a branch in the past history of OpenSim has been to replace<br>trunk, merging from branches in svn is just too painful.<br><br>Personally, I'm with Mike. There is nothing to discuss until this is<br>publicly testable code. <br>
<br> -Sean<br><br>--
<br>__________________________________________________________________<br><br>Sean Dague Mid-Hudson Valley<br>sean at dague dot net Linux Users Group<br><a href="http://dague.net" target="_blank">http://dague.net</a> <a href="http://mhvlug.org" target="_blank">http://mhvlug.org</a><br>
<br>There is no silver bullet. Plus, werewolves make better neighbors<br>than zombies, and they tend to keep the vampire population down.<br>__________________________________________________________________<br></div></div>
</div></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Opensim-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de">Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>===================================<br>The wind<br>scours the earth for prayers<br>The night obscures them
</div>