<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>Well, this is the tricky case; where the function is actually part of an API.<BR>
<BR>
Either you tag it with something to say it's so (like /// API Function : Do not change) or whatever the doc standard dictates,<BR>
or you create 'API Interfaces' that are set in stone. (As in, until next proper 'release')<BR><BR>
Personally, I'd prefer the latter. <BR>
<BR>
But as it stands right now, it seems the third and only way is to mail the dev list about it, remove it in a well-encapsulated revision, and see if anyone shouts.<BR>
<BR>Best regards,<BR>Stefan Andersson<BR>Tribal Media AB<BR> <BR>Join the 3d web revolution : <A href="http://tribalnet.se/" target=_blank>http://tribalnet.se/</A><BR> <BR><BR><BR><BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
<BR>
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:58:44 +0900<BR>> From: mmazur@gmail.com<BR>> To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de<BR>> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] OpenSim codebase statistics.<BR>> <BR>> Hi,<BR>> <BR>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:53:28 +0900<BR>> Ryan McDougall <sempuki1@gmail.com> wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > As a new contributor, I think its fantastic to remove unused code.<BR>> > However it could require a bit of effort to ensure no regressions.<BR>> <BR>> I'm curious how removing unused code can introduce regressions?<BR>> <BR>> Can plugins call unused code? Of course if they can, the code is no<BR>> longer unused :)<BR>> <BR>> Mike<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Opensim-dev mailing list<BR>> Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de<BR>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev<BR><BR></body>
</html>