[Opensim-dev] 0.7 Release Discussion

Sun May 31 21:39:48 UTC 2009

Could you perhaps sort those by the assigned priority?  721 is
priority 'low', for example.

-Kyle H

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Charles Krinke <cfk at pacbell.net> wrote:
> Just to pick on the "Longest Open" for a little bit, here they are. The last
> column is the number of days the Mantis has been open.
>
> It seems to me that a Mantis open over a year is a good candidate for a
> feature request, perhaps a 'wont fix' or even a 'we did fix and forgot to
> close'.
>
> So, to avoid me unilaterally starting to close some of these, I would like
> to call on others to look into them and I will support *any* reasonable
> decision in getting our "Longest Open" to be less then 451 days old.
>
> Charles
>
>
>
>
> 0000721 - opensim does not support https in *STANDALONE*451
> 0000765 - Continual request of 'non existent asset'
> c228d1cf-4b5d-4ba8-84f4-899a0796aa97444
> 0000960 - Neighbors that start up don't display411
> 0001054 - On teleport, child agents are not hidden, but remain visible in
> region of origin400
> 0001131 - Physical prims pushed off edge of region roll to infinity392
> 0001147 - Doing shift-drag-copy linked non-phantom prims produces phantom
> copies390
> 0001149 - Doing shift-drag-copy linked prims produces a new center point390
> 0001176 - "Already logged in" message on first connect attempt388
> 0001184 - Day Cycle Editor settings not remembered for sim388
> 0001209 - There are currently no constraints on link set size or prim
> count.387
> 0001211 - Individually set Phantom flag for prims in a linkset387
> 0001217 - Edited child prims in linksets revert and don't save as changed387
> 0001229 - Avatar sometimes remains with selection after right-clicking an
> object385
> 0001244 - Prim permissions lost while in-world384
> 0001317 - r4746 - client does not get or display "inventory timeout" message
> from region377
> 0001332 - Taking groups of objects not implemented376
> 0001342 - sitting pose is not correct when sitting on a box375
> 0001343 - sitting pose is not correct when sitting on the rotated
> cylinder375
> 0001344 - simulator can't provide service and system cpu 100%375
> 0001347 - Client gets flooded upon logon and lag increased in sims375
> 0001366 - sitting facing to the hill when sitting on tali ground373
> 0001373 - Logouts/Dropoffs not properly registered at both User Server and
> Region server373
> 0001379 - terrain load wildcard effect without using change regions first371
> 0001397 - Prims out of FOV should not be rendered client-side369
> 0001415 - llTargetOmega stops working from time to time
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Charles Krinke <cfk at pacbell.net>
> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 1:29:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] 0.7 Release Discussion
>
> No problem, man.
>
> As I look at two other parts of the Mantis Summary page, both the "Longest
> Open" and the "Most Active" jump out at me.
>
> So, ... I would suggest that if we were to concentrate on resolving/closing
> some of the "Longest Open" and "Most Active" that we have a way to move
> forward in a more or less logical fashion.
>
> Charles
>
> ________________________________
> From: Nebadon Izumi <nebadon2025 at gmail.com>
> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 1:26:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] 0.7 Release Discussion
>
> I stand corrected, I went back and you are correct, i only had closed
> filtered out and not the "resolved" issues, hence the inflated count. sorry
> about that.  I think all of these ideas are great, sorry to be the stickler
> in the mud, but I'd rather everyone beat up on me now while were discussing
> it than after the fact, so thanks everyone for comments, very good ideas.
>
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Charles Krinke <cfk at pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>> It pains me to disagree with you, Nebadon, but when I look at the summary
>> page on our Mantis this morning, I see 247 open Mantis issues. This actually
>> is an admirable goal and I would think clearing as many of these as possible
>> over the next month is an admirable goal. Like all goals, we always can
>> declare success when it "feels" right and thats my wriggle room.
>>
>> Charles
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Nebadon Izumi <nebadon2025 at gmail.com>
>> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 6:34:36 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] 0.7 Release Discussion
>>
>> I can agree with that, if everyone else agrees i have no problem with it,
>> I would just hate for anyone to think that we are locking things up and they
>> wont have our support.  And mostly i was more concerned with trying to clear
>> mantis, that seams a bit unrealistic, as a good portion of fixing the mantis
>> probably rely on us instituting many feature requests.  It kind of goes
>> against the whole premise of freezing up feature requests.
>>
>> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Stefan Andersson <stefan at tribalmedia.se>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Wise from experience, I would never propose anything as preposterous as
>>> to tell any core dev to do anything.
>>>
>>> But if a substantial part of core devs and the patching community think
>>> it's a good idea and can be swayed to rally for it, I think we can see some
>>> really extraordinary measures that would make us all look pretty god damn
>>> good.
>>>
>>> And hell, I stated it would be ambitious. Aim for the stars, hit the
>>> treetops, you know.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Stefan Andersson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 06:24:51 -0700
>>> From: nebadon2025 at gmail.com
>>> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>>> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] 0.7 Release Discussion
>>>
>>> Have you even looked at mantis??? there are 728 open tickets, chances are
>>> if we clear mantis, we will have OpenSimulator 1.0.. I personally don't see
>>> this as feasible, this is to me looks like us trying to control what all the
>>> developers are doing, and I have to -1 this idea as it would probably make
>>> most devs just stop working.
>>>
>>> Neb
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Stefan Andersson <stefan at tribalmedia.se>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I do believe we're all feeling the advent of 0.7 - a milestone in any
>>> open source project.
>>>
>>> Here's a crazy idea for you; how about we agree to freeze feature set and
>>> major architecture as of now, and concentrate on only:
>>>
>>> * Finalizing the backend restructuring
>>> * Clear mantis (hell, let's CLEAR mantis! how's that for ambitious?)
>>> * Write unit tests
>>>
>>> until the cows come home, and tag the cow homecoming rev as 0.7? Or, say,
>>> 1st of aug happens, and we'll tag 0.6.7 then instead. ;)
>>>
>>> I believe this kind of solidified 0.7 would give us all a breather, help
>>> us recoup, and then we can all go back to fiddling with our various dev
>>> projects again.
>>>
>>> What you say?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Stefan Andersson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Opensim-dev mailing list
>>> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Emory Cerquoni - Nebadon Izumi @ http://osgrid.org/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Opensim-dev mailing list
>>> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Emory Cerquoni - Nebadon Izumi @ http://osgrid.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensim-dev mailing list
>> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Emory Cerquoni - Nebadon Izumi @ http://osgrid.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
>