[Opensim-dev] Technical assessment of Cable Beach asset server
Mike Mazur
mmazur at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 00:46:01 UTC 2009
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:42:39 -0500
Sean Dague <sdague at gmail.com> wrote:
> If [Cable Beach] going to be the default, then it really needs to be
> in trunk, so any core members can work on bugs in it.
This is the goal, for Cable Beach to replace the existing asset server.
> I'd really rather see us on the Addins front, and if there is
> something Addins is missing, lets sort that out with the community.
Fair enough. I'll start looking at using Mono.Addins with Cable Beach.
> My concerns in this area are that we shouldn't have 2 embedded
> webservers in OpenSim, as that just makes working with them hard. We
> should have 1, whichever makes sense. And that 1 should probably be a
> main project, not a branch in a seperate repository.
>
> If there are chances needed upstream, lets get them upstream instead
> of creating more side branches.
John, can you please update the upstream HttpServer with the new
changes?
Thanks,
Mike
More information about the Opensim-dev
mailing list