[Opensim-dev] Technical assessment of Cable Beach asset server

Mike Mazur mmazur at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 00:46:01 UTC 2009


Hi,

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:42:39 -0500
Sean Dague <sdague at gmail.com> wrote:

> If [Cable Beach] going to be the default, then it really needs to be
> in trunk, so any core members can work on bugs in it.

This is the goal, for Cable Beach to replace the existing asset server.

> I'd really rather see us on the Addins front, and if there is
> something Addins is missing, lets sort that out with the community.

Fair enough. I'll start looking at using Mono.Addins with Cable Beach.

> My concerns in this area are that we shouldn't have 2 embedded
> webservers in OpenSim, as that just makes working with them hard.  We
> should have 1, whichever makes sense.  And that 1 should probably be a
> main project, not a branch in a seperate repository.
> 
> If there are chances needed upstream, lets get them upstream instead
> of creating more side branches.

John, can you please update the upstream HttpServer with the new
changes?

Thanks,
Mike



More information about the Opensim-dev mailing list