[Opensim-dev] Authentication, take 2: Capabilities
Diva Canto
diva at metaverseink.com
Thu Feb 26 21:32:08 UTC 2009
Yes, something like that.
And "If they're done via UDP, what was the problem with the Inventory
CAP that was deployed sometime last year?"
Thanks.
Dirk Krause wrote:
>
> I can do that.
>
>
>
> Is the correct question:
>
> "Are the inventory requests done via caps or via UDP?"
>
>
>
> *Von:* opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de
> [mailto:opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de] *Im Auftrag von *Diva Canto
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2009 22:24
> *An:* opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> *Betreff:* Re: [Opensim-dev] Authentication, take 2: Capabilities
>
>
>
> I don't subscribe to that mailing list. Can someone please do that?
>
> I've been searching on Google, and I found a meeting with Mark where
> he clearly says that inventory access has swicthed to caps:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/User:Zero_Linden/Office_Hours/2008_Mar_13
> (search 'caps')
>
> I couldn't find documents mentioning the retraction of that yet.
>
> Dirk Krause wrote:
>
> Maybe it would make sense to verify this on sl-dev mailing list?
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de <mailto:opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de> [mailto:opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de] Im Auftrag von Melanie
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2009 22:10
> An: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de <mailto:opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de>
> Betreff: Re: [Opensim-dev] Authentication, take 2: Capabilities
>
> That is what was said. Linden reverted the inventory protocol to UDP
> on their servers because of an issue in the viewer that was so
> fundamental that it was decided to not be worth fixing.
>
> Whether this is true, I don't know. but it was said.
>
> Melanie
>
> Diva Canto wrote:
>
>
> Melanie wrote:
>
>
>
> Linden turned it off because it's broken in the client. So, we can
>
> try to use it but will hit the same wall, since the client was never
>
> fixed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Melanie: are you 100% sure about this? This, of course, is critical. The
>
> whole point of my thinking was to access inventory over the consistent
>
> model of CAPs; if that's not working, then everything else is minor.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Opensim-dev mailing list
>
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de <mailto:Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de>
>
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de <mailto:Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de>
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de <mailto:Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de>
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-dev/attachments/20090226/d4cbc6c8/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Opensim-dev
mailing list