[Opensim-dev] MXPClient?

[MW]

I agree that we should support as many clients as possible, and its a good idea to have a couple in core, but I would be against having support for lots of clients directly in core. Most extra ones should go on forge etc.

--- On Mon, 23/2/09, Frisby, Adam <adam at deepthink.com.au> wrote:
From: Frisby, Adam <adam at deepthink.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MXPClient?
To: "opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de" <opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de>
Date: Monday, 23 February, 2009, 4:16 AM

I'm open to ideas on other clients we could implement too btw.

Anything that has a well described protocol is up for grabs.

Adam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
> bounces at lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Diva Canto
> Sent: Sunday, 22 February 2009 7:55 PM
> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MXPClient?
>
> Frisby, Adam wrote:
> > Melanie can probably elucidate a little as to why it's good for
us to
> have a couple of IClientAPI's in core - namely that it helps prevent
> monoculture in naming schemas and flow.
> >
> +100 just for this.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
Opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-dev/attachments/20090223/a57d58d7/attachment-0001.html>