[Opensim-dev] Moving OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1 to Framework

[Frisby, Adam]

I thought Framework was for interfaces only really. (or abstract classes)

Maybe this should be a 0.7 goal - clean up the namespaces.

I suggest we group into maybe:

OpenSim.Framework.* = Interfaces
OpenSim.Region.* = Region (Collapse Environment back to Region?)
OpenSim.Comms.Client.* = New namespace for ClientView/ClientStack/anything with packeting[?]
OpenSim.Comms.Intersim.* = Grid comms?

Might be worth polling some ideas here.

Regards,

Adam


> -----Original Message-----
> From: opensim-dev-bounces at lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
> bounces at lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Sean Dague
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2008 12:02 PM
> To: opensim-dev at lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Moving
> OpenSim.Region.Communications.Local/OGS1 to Framework
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:18:03PM -0400, Frisby, Adam wrote:
> > I don't think Framework is an appropriate place since it is an
> > implementation not an interface.
>
> There are a lot of object implementations in OpenSim.Framework.
>
> > Perhaps OpenSim.Communications.OGS1 is a more appropriate namespace?
>
> or OpenSim.Comm.OGS1 for something shorter to type.
>
> It might be a good idea to give an idea about what people think should
> go in each namespace.  I know I've been confused by what does or does
> not fit into Framework in the past.
>
>     -Sean
>
> --
> __________________________________________________________________
>
> Sean Dague                                       Mid-Hudson Valley
> sean at dague dot net                            Linux Users Group
> http://dague.net                                 http://mhvlug.org
>
> There is no silver bullet.  Plus, werewolves make better neighbors than
> zombies, and they tend to keep the vampire population down.
> __________________________________________________________________