| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2019-01-21 15:20 PST |  |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Summary | My Account |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||
| 0007304 | opensim | [REGION] Physics Engines | public | 2014-08-17 09:23 | 2015-04-13 10:54 | |||||
| Reporter | maurizio55 | |||||||||
| Assigned To | ||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | |||||
| Status | new | Resolution | open | |||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | ||||||||
| Product Version | master (dev code) | |||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | |||||||||
| Summary | 0007304: llTargetOmega not implemented for Physical object | |||||||||
| Description | According to LSL specs, llTargetOmega() should work for physical objects as well, actually physically rotating the object instead of simulating a rotation on client side. In Opensim llTargetOmega apparently has no effect on Physical Objects. (for opensim it would be an alternative to llAppryRotationalImpulse() or llSetAngularVelocity() since these functions are not yet implemented) | |||||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | call llTargetOmega() from an object with Physics enabled. | |||||||||
| Additional Information | Any plan re the implementation of missing physical lsl functions, especially related to rotation? llAppryRotationalImpulse() or llSetAngularVelocity() and so on... | |||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||||
| Git Revision or version number | ||||||||||
| Run Mode | Standalone (Multiple Regions) | |||||||||
| Physics Engine | BulletSim | |||||||||
| Environment | Mono / Linux64 | |||||||||
| Mono Version | 2.10 | |||||||||
| Viewer | ||||||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||||
 Relationships |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0026776) maurizio55 (reporter) 2014-08-20 17:47 |
Question for developers: is the implementation of this kind of physical functions (including phisical version of llSetKeyframedMotion etc) considered low priority? I mean, will they be implemented in a reasonable time or better sticking to SL or something else for projects where Physics is heavily involved? |
|
(0026777) Robert Adams (administrator) 2014-08-22 07:07 |
this particular feature is not high on my list and, since this is an all volunteer project, there is no large scale project plan that is driving feature completion. Some of the less used physical functions (like the ones you mention) will happen after region crossing vehicles, for instance. Of course, the sources are available. Physical llTargetOmega should be a new motion actor in BulletSim (checkout the existing BSActorHover or BSActorSetForce) and llSetAngularVelocity could be just making the right calls as the physics engines already have the basic functionality. |
|
(0026792) djphil (reporter) 2014-08-29 17:14 |
About PRIM_OMEGA, i also found this problem : http://opensimulator.org/mantis/view.php?id=7209 [^] |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2014-08-17 09:23 | maurizio55 | New Issue | |
| 2014-08-17 09:24 | nebadon | Relationship added | related to 0006543 |
| 2014-08-20 17:47 | maurizio55 | Note Added: 0026776 | |
| 2014-08-22 07:07 | Robert Adams | Note Added: 0026777 | |
| 2014-08-29 17:14 | djphil | Note Added: 0026792 | |
| 2015-04-13 10:54 | Magnuz | Relationship added | related to 0007524 |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2012 MantisBT Group |
 |